Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall)

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Smoothwall Filter (On Premise)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) shared this idea  · 
  2. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Smoothwall Filter (On Premise)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) shared this idea  · 
  3. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Smoothwall Filter (On Premise)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) shared this idea  · 
  4. 31 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) commented  · 

    The active-passive bonding is now available in Main Update 69 which is now available to all smoothwall customers. Please fresh your update list and install updates 69 - 75.

    This was implemented as part of the following idea http://smoothwall.uservoice.com/forums/145832-general/suggestions/3689583-support-for-active-passive-bonding.

    This idea is for specifically for having both nics live at the same time.

    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) shared this idea  · 
  5. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Smoothwall Filter (On Premise)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) shared this idea  · 
  6. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Smoothwall Filter (On Premise)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) shared this idea  · 
  7. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Smoothwall Filter (On Premise)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) shared this idea  · 
  8. 63 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) commented  · 

    Also for multi Tenant/Multi school environment you would also want to be able to use Locations in the policy.

    e.g

    Group | Session Policy | Time | Location | Auth Method | Login | Time out
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Student | Students Policy | School Day | Everywhere | SSL Back/Cookie | No
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Staff | Staff Policy | School Day | Teachers Office | SSL Back/Cookie | Yes

    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) commented  · 

    Also may want to include a Time Period this applies, so that if you do not define session end periods into the night, it fails back to the default time out.

    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) shared this idea  · 
  9. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Smoothwall Filter (On Premise) » Reporting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) shared this idea  · 
  10. 13 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Smoothwall Filter (On Premise) » Reporting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) shared this idea  · 
  11. 177 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Smoothwall Filter (On Premise)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Humby responded

    Hi,

    I know it’s been a while since our last update on this idea. There have been a few tweaks to NTLM and AD authentication since the last update but there are still technical limitations with what we can do with the ageing NTLM protocol.

    If you are having issues with NTLM good news is we recently introduced our own Identification system called IDex in the Kenilworth release. This can work either with Client software, like NTLM but without the authentication exceptions. Or you can use an Agent which runs on your AD domain controllers.

    Either way you can test IDex out alongside NTLM, instructions are included in our help along with download links. https://help.smoothwall.net/Kenilworth/Content/idex/about.htm

    Regards,
    Chris

    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) shared this idea  · 
  12. 46 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Smoothwall Filter (On Premise)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) commented  · 

    Having this feature would give the following benefits:

    Improved Security - As its each user will user there own accounts thus a one 2 one password.
    - Password changing policy of AD will apply and one password would not be used for potentially years
    Easier to management of users - Just have to add a group to AD/LDap to give them by pass controls
    Simpler for user - No need to remember a separate password.

    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) supported this idea  · 
  13. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) shared this idea  · 
  14. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Smoothwall Filter (On Premise)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) shared this idea  · 
  15. 26 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Smoothwall Filter (On Premise)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) shared this idea  · 
  16. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Smoothwall Filter (On Premise) » Guardian Filtering  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) shared this idea  · 
  17. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Smoothwall Filter (On Premise)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) shared this idea  · 
  18. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Smoothwall Filter (On Premise)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) shared this idea  · 
  19. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Smoothwall Filter (On Premise) » Reporting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason Holdstock (Smoothwall) shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base