Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Smoothwall Filter (On Premise) » Reporting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Smoothwall Filter (On Premise) » Reporting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  3. 304 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    25 comments  ·  Smoothwall Filter (On Premise) » Reporting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    started  ·  Chris Humby responded

    Hi,

    This is one of our most voted ideas and we used the feedback to help build our Safeguarding reports in Framlingham and Glamis releases. Aim was to provide something that;

    • Simple and easy to understand so it can be delivered and used directly by Safeguarding officers, HR and other non-IT personnel with minimal understanding of web technology.
    • Highlighted the breaches and intent with specific colour coded breach levels and relevant information highlighting the user intent.
    • Report broken down in to headers on a per user basis.
    • Ability to delegate, email or print reports directly to the relevant department, minimising IT departments overheads with this work.

    We know many customers are using these reports already and have received much positive feedback.

    However, I can see from previous comments there’s still room for improvement and you have some smart ideas on how to take this further. I’m…

    Anonymous commented  · 

    The Safeguarding reports are the least/never used reports in our school. Not sure what the original requestor was talking about, but I need simpler formats on everything on the Reports menu. Safeguarding is a minor improvement and like I said, not needed.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 83 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Smoothwall Filter (On Premise) » Reporting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 79 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Smoothwall Filter (On Premise)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    started  ·  Chris Humby responded

    Hi,

    I know it’s been discussed for some time but IPv6 development is finally underway! Thanks for the feedback so far and those who helped fill out our survey.

    As it’s a mammoth project to make entire Smoothwall networking and all modules support dual stack IPv4 / IPv6 it will be completed in stages over the next few major releases.

    I’m now looking for willing customers who are planning to move to IPv6, or perhaps already are deploying IPv6 on their networks to help us gain valuable feedback as the project develops. This will include discussion on your requirements and early previews of the work we’re doing in our agile demos.

    Please email me at chris.humby@smoothwall.net and let me know if you’re interested in participating. I’ll also keep uservoice posted with updates as the work progresses.

    Regards,

    Chris Humby
    Product Manager
    Smoothwall

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base